Reinigungsleistungen für die Nordischen Botschaften und das Felleshus in Berlin

Status
Offen
Angebotsfrist
06.10.2026, 13:00 (Europe/Berlin)
Geschätzter Auftragswert
850.000 EUR
Lose
1
Auftraggeber
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of DenmarkProfil ansehen
Erfüllungsregion
Berlin, Deutschland
Verfahren
Offenes Verfahren
Auftragsart
Dienstleistung
Veröffentlicht
08.09.2026
Bekanntmachungsnummer
618123-2026
Verfahrensnummer
3f522c70-239f-446f-bc7a-9e9b4db0b0a5
CPV-Codes
90910000 · Reinigungsdienste; 90911200 · Gebäudereinigung; 90911300 · FensterreinigungMehr anzeigen

Passt diese Ausschreibung zu deinem Unternehmen?

Die KI prüft sie gegen deine eigenen Kriterien und zeigt dir Punkt für Punkt, was passt und wo es hakt.

14 Tage kostenlos testen

Kurzbeschreibung

Das dänische Außenministerium beschafft im Auftrag der dänischen, finnischen, isländischen, norwegischen und schwedischen Botschaft in Berlin umfassende Reinigungsleistungen. Der Leistungsumfang umfasst regelmäßige und gründliche Reinigung, Innenfensterreinigung sowie Sonder- und bedarfsabhängige Reinigungen in vier Botschaftsgebäuden und dem Felleshus; die finnische Botschaft selbst ist nicht eingeschlossen. Die zu reinigenden Gebäude umfassen etwa 3.285 m² sowie 2.400 m² Tiefgaragenfläche in Berlin, der geschätzte Auftragswert beträgt 850.000 Euro und die Vertragslaufzeit 1.825 Tage; die Angebotsfrist endet am 6. Oktober 2026 um 11:00 Uhr.

KI-Zusammenfassung · Maßgeblich ist die Originalbekanntmachung.

Leistungsbeschreibung

The Danish, Finnish, Icelandic, Norwegian and Swedish Embassy in Berlin (the contracting authority) are looking for a supplier to provide cleaning services. The Nordic Embassies in Berlin are a joint representation of the five Nordic countries — Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. They represent the diplomatic interests of these countries in Germany and promote bilateral cooperation in the fields of politics, business, culture, and science. The Nordic Embassies were opened in their current form in 1999. They operate under the leadership of the respective ambassadors of the participating countries and form an important part of Berlin’s diplomatic landscape. The Nordic Embassies complex, consisting of five individual embassy buildings and the shared “Felleshus” building, symbolizes the close cooperation among the Nordic states while preserving their respective national identities. The Felleshus serves as a public venue and platform for cultural and scientific exchange projects that strengthen dialogue between the Nordic countries and Germany. The Nordic Embassies are guided by the principle of sustainability and are committed to promoting innovation and environmentally friendly projects. The cleaning services shall be delivered in the Danish, Icelandic, Norwegian and Swedish building and the Felleshus. The buildings cover a total area of approximately 3,285 m² and 2,400 m² of underground parking space. Finland is only part of the procurement because of the Felleshus and cleaning of the Finnish Embassy is not part of the Contract. The Contract concerns delivery of regular cleaning, deep cleaning, internal glass cleaning, special cleaning and ad-hoc cleaning. It is a requirement that the certain key tasks, regular cleaning and deep cleaning, cf. annex 1.2, are performed by the successful tenderer itself. The contracting authority will hold an information meeting and an inspection of the place of performance for potential tenderers. For more information see the tender conditions section 3.4 (Information meeting and Inspection).

Leistungen nach Losen (1)

  • LOT-0000 · Open procedure regarding contract for cleaning services850.000 EUR

    The Danish, Finnish, Icelandic, Norwegian and Swedish Embassy in Berlin (the contracting authority) are looking for a supplier to provide cleaning services. The Nordic Embassies in Berlin are a joint representation of the five Nordic countries — Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. They represent the diplomatic interests of these countries in Germany and promote bilateral cooperation in the fields of politics, business, culture, and science. The Nordic Embassies were opened in their current form in 1999. They operate under the leadership of the respective ambassadors of the participating countries and form an important part of Berlin’s diplomatic landscape. The Nordic Embassies complex, consisting of five individual embassy buildings and the shared “Felleshus” building, symbolizes the close cooperation among the Nordic states while preserving their respective national identities. The Felleshus serves as a public venue and platform for cultural and scientific exchange projects that strengthen dialogue between the Nordic countries and Germany. The Nordic Embassies are guided by the principle of sustainability and are committed to promoting innovation and environmentally friendly projects. The cleaning services shall be delivered in the Danish, Icelandic, Norwegian and Swedish building and the Felleshus. The buildings cover a total area of approximately 3,285 m² and 2,400 m² of underground parking space. Finland is only part of the procurement because of the Felleshus and cleaning of the Finnish Embassy is not part of the Contract. The Contract concerns delivery of regular cleaning, deep cleaning, internal glass cleaning, special cleaning and ad-hoc cleaning. It is a requirement that the certain key tasks, regular cleaning and deep cleaning, cf. annex 1.2, are performed by the successful tenderer itself. The contracting authority will hold an information meeting and an inspection of the place of performance for potential tenderers. For more information see the tender conditions section 3.4 (Information meeting and Inspection).

    Frist: 06.10.2026, 02:00 (Europe/Berlin)

Anforderungen an deinen Betrieb

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for corruption, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 3 of the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union, OJ C 195, 25.6.1997, p. 1, and in Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 31.7.2003, p. 54). This exclusion ground also includes corruption as defined in the national law of the contracting authority (contracting entity) or the economic operator. Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for fraud, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? Within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48). Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for money laundering or terrorist financing, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 15). Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for participation in a criminal organisation, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime (OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42). Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). This exclusion ground also includes inciting or aiding or abetting or attempting to commit an offence, as referred to in Article 4 of that Framework Decision. Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1). Is the economic operator guilty of grave professional misconduct? Where applicable, see definitions in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents. Can the economic operator confirm that: a) It has been guilty of serious misrepresentation in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria, b) It has withheld such information, c) It has not been able, without delay, to submit the supporting documents required by a contracting authority or contracting entity, and d) It has undertaken to unduly influence the decision making process of the contracting authority or contracting entity, to obtain confidential information that may confer upon it undue advantages in the procurement procedure or to negligently provide misleading information that may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award? Is the economic operator aware of any conflict of interest, as indicated in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents due to its participation in the procurement procedure? Has the economic operator or an undertaking related to it advised the contracting authority or contracting entity or otherwise been involved in the preparation of the procurement procedure? Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment social security contributions, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment? Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment of taxes, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment? Are the business activities of the economic operator suspended? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract. Is the economic operator bankrupt? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract. Is the economic operator in arrangement with creditors? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract. Is the economic operator the subject of insolvency or winding-up? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract. Are the assets of the economic operator being administered by a liquidator or by the court? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract. Is the economic operator in in any analogous situation like bankruptcy arising from a similar procedure under national laws and regulations? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Wie wird das Angebot bewertet?

LOT-0000 · Open procedure regarding contract for cleaning services

Reference is made to tender conditions section 7.1 (Evaluation in respect of the subcriterion Quality).
30 %
Reference is made to tender conditions section 7.2 (Evaluation in respect of the subcriterion Sustainability).
5 %
Reference is made to tender conditions section 7.3 (Overall tender evaluation).
65 %

Vergabeunterlagen

Für dieses Portal konnte keine Dateiliste ermittelt werden. Ein abgeschlossener Abruf ist nicht dokumentiert.

Anforderungen

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for corruption, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 3 of the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union, OJ C 195, 25.6.1997, p. 1, and in Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 31.7.2003, p. 54). This exclusion ground also includes corruption as defined in the national law of the contracting authority (contracting entity) or the economic operator. Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for fraud, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? Within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48). Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for money laundering or terrorist financing, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 15). Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for participation in a criminal organisation, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime (OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42). Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). This exclusion ground also includes inciting or aiding or abetting or attempting to commit an offence, as referred to in Article 4 of that Framework Decision. Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1). Is the economic operator guilty of grave professional misconduct? Where applicable, see definitions in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents. Can the economic operator confirm that: a) It has been guilty of serious misrepresentation in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria, b) It has withheld such information, c) It has not been able, without delay, to submit the supporting documents required by a contracting authority or contracting entity, and d) It has undertaken to unduly influence the decision making process of the contracting authority or contracting entity, to obtain confidential information that may confer upon it undue advantages in the procurement procedure or to negligently provide misleading information that may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award? Is the economic operator aware of any conflict of interest, as indicated in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents due to its participation in the procurement procedure? Has the economic operator or an undertaking related to it advised the contracting authority or contracting entity or otherwise been involved in the preparation of the procurement procedure? Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment social security contributions, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment? Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment of taxes, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment? Are the business activities of the economic operator suspended? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract. Is the economic operator bankrupt? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract. Is the economic operator in arrangement with creditors? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract. Is the economic operator the subject of insolvency or winding-up? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract. Are the assets of the economic operator being administered by a liquidator or by the court? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract. Is the economic operator in in any analogous situation like bankruptcy arising from a similar procedure under national laws and regulations? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Änderungen und Bieterfragen

0 Einträge

Keine Änderungen zur Bekanntmachung bekannt.

Vergleichbare Verfahren272vergeben oder Frist abgelaufen
Mit erfasstem Zuschlag213 verschiedene Auftragnehmer
ZuschlagssummeMedian
Zuschlag zu SchätzwertMedian, 16 Vergaben

Ähnliche Verfahren, die du verpasst hast

Frist in den letzten 12 Monaten abgelaufen, nach Ähnlichkeit
Titel
Umweltfreundliche Unterhalts- und Sonderreinigung eines Bundestagsgebäudes in BerlinDeutscher Bundestag - VergabereferatBerlin, Deutschland14.01.2026 -
Umweltfreundliche Unterhalts- und Sonderreinigung eines Bundestags-DienstgebäudesDeutscher Bundestag - VergabereferatBerlin, Deutschland08.10.2025 -
Büro- und Fensterreinigungsleistungen für ImmobilienbestandHausWart Plus Servicegesellschaft mbHBerlin, Deutschland20.07.2026 -
Gebäudereinigung und Fensterreinigung für die Botschaft von Irland in BerlinDepartment of Foreign Affairs and Trade/An Roinn Gnóthaí Eachtracha agus TrádálaDublin, IRL20.07.2026165 Tsd. €
Unterhalts-, Bedarfs- sowie Glas- und Fensterreinigung für das Bundesarchiv in Berlin-LichterfeldeBundesrepublik Deutschland, vertreten durch das Bundesministerium des Innern, vertreten durch das Beschaffungsamt des BMIBonn, Deutschland12.08.2026 -
Gebäude-, Unterhalts-, Grund- und Glasreinigung in HannoverBundesanstalt für ImmobilienaufgabenBonn, Deutschland06.08.2026 -
Umweltfreundliche Glas-, Glasfassaden-, Tagesglas- und SonderreinigungDeutscher Bundestag - VergabereferatBerlin, Deutschland08.10.2025 -
Unterhalts-, Boden- und Grundreinigung eines Bürostandorts in BerlinDeutsche Akkreditierungsstelle GmbH (DAkkS)Berlin, Deutschland17.06.2026 -

Wer gewinnt solche Vergaben?

Die 300 inhaltlich ähnlichsten Verfahren im erfassten Bestand
Trend
RGRUWE GmbHBerlin5015.09.2026157 Tsd. €stabil
AIApleona Infra Services GmbHBerlin4008.09.20262,1 Mio. €steigend
CEClean Excellence GmbHBonn4007.09.2026 - steigend
GNGötz-Gebäudemanagement Nord GmbHBerlin4022.06.2026564 Tsd. €steigend
PDPiepenbrock Dienstleistungen GmbH + Co. KGGreifswald3017.08.2026507 Tsd. €steigend
VSVeolia Solutions Deutschland GmbHSaarbrücken3014.07.2026546 Tsd. €steigend
2G2M Gruppe GmbHPotsdam3013.07.202674 Tsd. €steigend
WSWackler Service Group GmbH & Co. KGChemnitz3003.07.2026578 Tsd. €stabil
RSReigenia Service GmbH & Co. KG - 3029.06.20261,1 Mio. €steigend
SGSTEMS Gebäudeservice GmbHBerlin3024.11.2025877 Tsd. €stabil

Wer schreibt solche Vergaben aus?

Regionen: Berlin (102) · Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (22) · Nordrhein-Westfalen (21) · Bayern (21) · Schleswig-Holstein (20) · Niedersachsen (14)

Laufende Rahmenverträge

Berlin
  • Veranstaltungs- und Unterhaltsreinigung in den Messehallen 1 bis 6New Line GmbHMesse Berlin GmbHBerlin, Deutschland
    27.11.2023noch 2 Monate30.11.2026
    Neuausschreibung erwartet ca. Q2 2026 · Ende vsl., aus dem geplanten Zeitraum abgeleitet
  • Veranstaltungs- und Unterhaltsreinigung für Messehallen und Veranstaltungsgebäude in BerlinDr. Sasse Gebäudedienste GmbHMesse Berlin GmbHBerlin, Deutschland
    27.11.2023noch 2 Monate30.11.2026
    Neuausschreibung erwartet ca. Q2 2026 · Ende vsl., aus dem geplanten Zeitraum abgeleitet
  • Veranstaltungsbezogene Glasreinigungsarbeiten für Messe- und VeranstaltungsflächenWISAG Gebäudereinigung Berlin GmbH & Co. KGMesse Berlin GmbHBerlin, Deutschland
    27.11.2023noch 2 Monate30.11.2026
    Neuausschreibung erwartet ca. Q2 2026 · Ende vsl., aus dem geplanten Zeitraum abgeleitet
  • Unterhaltsbezogene Reinigungsleistungen für Verwaltungs-, Servicebereiche und AußengeländeWISAG Gebäudereinigung Berlin GmbH & Co. KGMesse Berlin GmbHBerlin, Deutschland
    27.11.2023noch 2 Monate30.11.2026
    Neuausschreibung erwartet ca. Q2 2026 · Ende vsl., aus dem geplanten Zeitraum abgeleitet
  • Reinigungsdienstleistungen für Geschäftsräume in BerlinWackler Service Group GmbH & Co. KG +1 weitereBwFuhrparkService GmbHSiegburg, Deutschland
    311 Tsd. €
    11.02.2025noch 5 Monate11.02.2027
    Neuausschreibung erwartet ca. Q3 2026 · Ende vsl., aus dem geplanten Zeitraum abgeleitet
  • Catering, Objektschutz und Reinigung für Bundesbankstandorte in BerlinEurest Deutschland GmbHDeutsche Bundesbank, Zentralbereich BeschaffungenFrankfurt am Main, Deutschland
    0 €
    25.03.2025noch 9 Monate30.06.2027
    Neuausschreibung erwartet ca. Q4 2026 · Ende vsl., aus dem geplanten Zeitraum abgeleitet

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark

Aktiv seit 2026 · 1 Verfahren
Profil öffnen
Verfahren pro Jahr1Ø seit 2026
Ø Auftragswertgeschätzt, laut Bekanntmachung
VergebenVerfahren mit Zuschlag
RahmenverträgeAnteil an Verfahren
Verfahren je Woche · 1 seit 2026Spitze KW 37 · 2026 · 1

Leistungsbereiche

Top 5 nach Verfahren

Erfüllungsorte

nach Verfahren

Bisherige Auftragnehmer

Zuschläge dieses Auftraggebers, alle Leistungsbereiche
Noch keine Zuschlagsmeldungen dieses Auftraggebers bekannt.

Laufende Rahmenverträge

nach voraussichtlichem Vertragsende

Keine laufenden Rahmenverträge dieses Auftraggebers bekannt.

Letzte Verfahren

neueste zuerst · Zuschlagsempfänger, wo veröffentlicht
08.09.2026Reinigungsleistungen für die Nordischen Botschaften und das Felleshus in BerlinOffen - 850 Tsd. €

Welche ähnlichen Ausschreibungen sind offen?

Alle ähnlichen Ausschreibungen anzeigen

Alle Angaben ohne Gewähr. Ausschreibungen können sich jederzeit ändern – wir übernehmen keine Gewähr für Aktualität, Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit der hier dargestellten Daten. Maßgeblich ist stets die Originalbekanntmachung des Auftraggebers.