TED·399622-2026·Schließt in 30 Tagen

Versicherungsmaklerdienstleistungen für TenneT

TenneT TSO GmbHBayreuth, GermanyVeröffentlicht 11. Juni 2026
Auftragswert
€0k
Veröffentlichter Wert
Einreichungsfrist
10. Juli 2026
30 Tage verbleibend
Leistungsbeschreibung

Was wird ausgeschrieben

Die TenneT TSO GmbH und TenneT TSO B.V. suchen Versicherungsmakler für ihre Aktivitäten in Deutschland und den Niederlanden. Der Auftrag umfasst vier Lose für Onshore- und Offshore-Versicherungen sowie Spezialpolicen. Die Vergabe erfolgt in einem Verhandlungsverfahren mit Teilnahmewettbewerb.

Vollständige Beschreibung anzeigen

Tender Description – Insurance Brokerage Services TenneT intend to procure comprehensive insurance brokerage services covering its activities in Germany (TenneT TSO GmbH) and the Netherlands (TenneT TSO B.V.). The procurement is structured into three separate lots (the “Lots”), for which bidders may submit offers for one, several, or all Lots. The objective of this procurement is to appoint one or more highly qualified insurance broker(s) capable of delivering high-quality, proactive, and strategic support across the full insurance lifecycle, ensuring optimal coverage, competitive pricing, and efficient claims handling for complex onshore and offshore operations as well as specialty risks. The contracting authorities are  TenneT TSO GmbH & TenneT TSO B.V. TenneT is a leading European Transmission System Operator (TSO) with its main activities in the Netherlands and Germany.  TenneT is one of the largest investors in national and international electricity grids on land and at sea. Our focus is on developing an integrated Northwest European energy market and facilitating the energy transition. TenneT is committed to meeting society's needs by being responsible, engaged and connected.  Tender Procedure TenneT is a "contracting entity" subject to the Public Procurement Act 2012. The notice for this Call for Competition will be published via tender platform Mercell Source-to-Contract to the Official Journal of the European Union available at http://ted.europa.eu. The Call for Competition will be based on the negotiated procedure with prior publication, which means that initially an interested market party may apply as a Candidate. Details on general tender procedure can be found in the document "Procedure Guidelines". Lots The scope of services is divided as follows: Lot 1: Onshore Policies – Engineering / Property / Liability Lot 2: Offshore Policies – Engineering / Property / Liability Lot 3: Specialty Policies handled from Netherlands Lot 4: Specialty Policies handled from Germany Each Lot comprises advisory, placement, and ongoing servicing of insurance solutions tailored to the respective risk profiles. Scope of Services The selected broker(s) shall provide end-to-end insurance brokerage services, including but not limited to the following service components: Team & Availability: Provision of a qualified, experienced, and dedicated service team with sufficient capacity and availability. The broker shall ensure continuity of key personnel and provide clear escalation paths. Broking & Policy Management: Strategic advice on insurance design and structuring, market analysis, placement and renewal of insurance programs, preparation and negotiation of policy wordings, and ongoing policy administration. Claims Management: Proactive claims handling and support throughout the entire claims lifecycle, including notification, coordination with insurers, advocacy on behalf of the contracting authority, and monitoring of claims performance. Reporting, KPIs & Performance Management: Regular, structured reporting on program performance, market developments, claims experience, and premium evolution. Definition, monitoring, and continuous improvement of agreed key performance indicators (KPIs). Transition & Onboarding: Seamless transition from incumbent arrangements, including structured onboarding, data transfer, and implementation of service processes ensuring uninterrupted coverage and service continuity. Geographic Scope All services must be provided for both the German and Dutch entities of the contracting authority. The broker is expected to demonstrate sufficient local presence, regulatory capability, and market access in both jurisdictions to ensure compliant and effective service delivery. In order to protect the confidentiality of the information provided by the client in the tender documents, it is mandatory to conclude a confidentiality Agreement as per "NDA" document provided for download via Mercell. Please send the signed and stamped copy to: holger.duba@tennet.eu After sending the NDA and a plausibility check by the Client, the Client will grant the interested parties access to the tender by Email. After registering for the tender at Mercell Source-to-Contract, you will find all tender documents in the call for competition phase under "Questionnaires", section "Call for Competition", question 1.1.  The bidder can not deduce eligibility for participation only from signing and submitting the NDA. TenneT will only accept tenderers who successfully qualify during the call for competition phase to participate in the offer phase.  The application for the call for competition must be submitted in due time and no later than by                              10.07.2026 at 12:00 CET via the e-Award platform Mercell Source-to-Contract. Individual extensions of time will not be granted. Please start your upload process early enough. Submission of the request to participate (applications) by Email, mail or fax are not permitted. A violation of this requirement will lead to disqualification of the applicant and exclusion from the tender process. Please make sure to familiarize yourself with the Schedule, Questionnaires, Messages section and the Q&A section early enough and thoroughly read through all relevant documents.  In case of technical difficulties, please reach out to Mercell: Servicedesk Mercell: support-nl@mercell.com Phone: +31 (0) 85-001 4593 Opening hours: 9:00-17:00 CET

VergabeHero-Einschätzung

Der Übertragungsnetzbetreiber TenneT schreibt europaweit Versicherungsmaklerdienstleistungen für seine deutschen und niederländischen Standorte aus. Ziel ist die strategische Unterstützung bei der Gestaltung, Platzierung und Verwaltung von Versicherungsprogrammen für komplexe Onshore- und Offshore-Anlagen sowie Spezialrisiken. Die Ausschreibung ist in vier Lose unterteilt, die sich nach geografischen Schwerpunkten und Risikoprofilen richten. Interessierte Unternehmen müssen vorab eine Vertraulichkeitsvereinbarung (NDA) unterzeichnen, um Zugriff auf die detaillierten Unterlagen über die Plattform Mercell zu erhalten. Die Teilnahme am Wettbewerb erfordert eine erfolgreiche Qualifizierung in der ersten Phase.

VersicherungsdienstleistungenBeratungsleistungenEnergieÖffentliche VerwaltungVersicherungsmaklerEnergieversorgungRisikomanagementOffshore WindOeffentliche AusschreibungGrenzueberschreitend
Eignung

Zentrale Anforderungen

4 Punkte
  • Unterzeichnung einer Vertraulichkeitsvereinbarung (NDA) als Voraussetzung für den Dokumentenzugriff
  • Erfolgreiche Qualifizierung im Teilnahmewettbewerb
  • Nachweis der regulatorischen Zulassung und Marktpräsenz in Deutschland und den Niederlanden
  • Einhaltung der Ausschlussgründe gemäß § 123 und § 124 GWB

KI-zusammengefasst aus den offiziellen Eignungsanforderungen. Verbindlich ist der Originaltext unten.

Eignungskriterien (Volltext)

§ 123 und § 124 Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen (GWB) As set forth in section 3.4 of the procedural guidelines, the contracting authority (TenneT) may, in accordance with the principles of transparency and equal treatment, require applicants to submit, complete, or correct missing, incomplete, or incorrect business-related documents, in particular self-declarations, declarations, certificates, or other evidence (§ 51(2) SektVO). Upon request by TenneT, the relevant documents must be submitted by the applicants within a (reasonable) deadline set by TenneT. The decision to request further information is at the sole discretion of TenneT. Applications for participation that do not contain the required documents will be excluded from the tendering procedure.

Lose

Aufteilung in Lose

4 Lote
LOT-0001Onshore policies - Engineering/Property/Liability
€0k

see tender documents

CPV 66518100
LOT-0002Offshore policies - Engineering/Property/Liability
€0k

see tender documents

CPV 66518100
LOT-0003Specialty policies handled from Netherlands
€0k

see tender documents

CPV 66518100
LOT-0004Specialty policies handled from Germany
€0k

see tender documents

CPV 66518100
Bewertung

Zuschlagskriterien

16 Kriterien
  • price

    The tender includes a price sheet as an attachment. The bidder submits the prices on the price sheet. The formats are fixed and the same for all bidders. Under this award criterion, the total price is evaluated. This is indicated as a total on the price sheet. The bid with the lowest bid price (= “best price”) receives the full points for this criterion. The bid prices of the remaining bids are linearly interpolated and compared to the lowest bid price. Bid prices that exceed the threshold of 200% of the lowest bid price are awarded 0 points.

    30%
  • quality

    Evaluation of Methodology and scope of work, including team, broking + market access, policy management, claims management. Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

    35%
  • quality

    Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

    25%
  • quality

    Evaluation of reporting, KPI, transition and SLA Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

    10%
  • price

    The tender includes a price sheet as an attachment. The bidder submits the prices on the price sheet. The formats are fixed and the same for all bidders. Under this award criterion, the total price is evaluated. This is indicated as a total on the price sheet. The bid with the lowest bid price (= “best price”) receives the full points for this criterion. The bid prices of the remaining bids are linearly interpolated and compared to the lowest bid price. Bid prices that exceed the threshold of 200% of the lowest bid price are awarded 0 points.

    30%
  • quality

    Evaluation of Methodology and scope of work, including team, broking + market access, policy management, claims management. Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

    35%
  • quality

    Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

    25%
  • quality

    Evaluation of reporting, KPI, transition and SLA Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

    10%
  • price

    The tender includes a price sheet as an attachment. The bidder submits the prices on the price sheet. The formats are fixed and the same for all bidders. Under this award criterion, the total price is evaluated. This is indicated as a total on the price sheet. The bid with the lowest bid price (= “best price”) receives the full points for this criterion. The bid prices of the remaining bids are linearly interpolated and compared to the lowest bid price. Bid prices that exceed the threshold of 200% of the lowest bid price are awarded 0 points.

    30%
  • quality

    Evaluation of Methodology and scope of work, including team, broking + market access, policy management, claims management. Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

    35%
  • quality

    Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

    25%
  • quality

    Evaluation of reporting, KPI, transition and SLA Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

    10%
  • price

    The tender includes a price sheet as an attachment. The bidder submits the prices on the price sheet. The formats are fixed and the same for all bidders. Under this award criterion, the total price is evaluated. This is indicated as a total on the price sheet. The bid with the lowest bid price (= “best price”) receives the full points for this criterion. The bid prices of the remaining bids are linearly interpolated and compared to the lowest bid price. Bid prices that exceed the threshold of 200% of the lowest bid price are awarded 0 points.

    30%
  • quality

    Evaluation of Methodology and scope of work, including team, broking + market access, policy management, claims management. Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

    35%
  • quality

    Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

    25%
  • quality

    Evaluation of reporting, KPI, transition and SLA Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

    10%
Zeitleiste

Zeitplan

  1. 11. Juni 2026
    Bekanntmachung veröffentlicht
    Auf TED publiziert
  2. 10. Juli 2026
    Einreichungsfrist
    Elektronische Einreichung
Anhänge

Dokumente & Links

1 Link