Wartung, Weiterentwicklung und Lizenzen für die ServiceNow-Plattform

Leistungen nach Losen (1)

• LOT-0001 · Maintenance and further development of ServiceNow

  Purpose Norsk Tipping (NT) currently uses ServiceNow, among other things, as IT Service Management and CSM tools and currently has a licence and maintenance agreement through DXC Technology. The contract expires in February 2027 and this procurement is a renewal of the maintenance contract for ServiceNow. NT is looking for a professional cooperation partner who can help maintain and further develop the current system. Tenderers must see possibilities, propose improvements and have good routines for development and support. The CSM module is used by Customer Service (Interactions/Case), Dealer service and some other small user groups (Case). Customer service is among norway's best and requires high efficiency in case handling with focus on quick access to information, getting pressure and high system degree. The system bears the mark that it has lived for almost 10 years. There are some technical debts that we need help cleaning up. Part of this is moving some internal APIs, which have been made available with MID-server, over to exposed facade services which are more responsive. The ITSM module is used to a very large degree by IT Operations, but also on customer service, dealer services (incident) and in Security. The case types in use are: incident, major incident, problem, change and request. NP's internal Service Desk and HR use Agent Workspace. ServiceDesk receives cases via the user portal, chat, telephone, attendance and e-mails that are automatically registered in ServiceNow. The case types they work with are primarily incident and request. It is a well developed Change management with a number of automated standard changes. ServiceNow is receiving more and more changes via pipeline or other integrations from internal Jira. The operational centre is the escalation point for general errors in the systems. They have monitoring and use, among other things, Splunk to receive events. Emphasis will be put on the tenderer ́s experience and competence in addition to operation and maintenance. Tenderers shall be a proactive consultant for the entire spectrum of services the contract covers. Whether there is new functionality in ServiceNow, a need for clearing in technical debts, smart choices around integrations, utilisation of functionality in the existing system based on the supplier knowing NP's business needs or the like. Requirements that shall be met. Norsk Tipping has organised development work in a product development model. The Customer Support product area is responsible for i.a. management and further development of ServiceNow, Genesys Cloud and self-service systems. Developers and consultants from the chosen supplier in this procurement will be important resources in this team together with other internal and external resources. NT has few, but good internal resources with competence in ServiceNow, and it is important to have a professional supplier that provides me good access to resources and who can contribute with expert help. As a starting point, the team consists of a system manager/owner and two system administrators, one of whom is defined as a team architect. The product development area currently consists of two multi-disciplinary teams, but which share internal resources and to a large degree work across. The product development manager has management responsibility for the teams and has, in addition, a team management role for the teams, in order to ensure progress and prioritising tasks. The product area is responsible for the management assignments being carried out and together prioritise small and large assignments based on the company principles for product development. The product development area follows the company ́s development cycle together with the other 12 areas and a joint plan is carried out at a general level, approx. 3 times per annum. The detailed planning will mainly be carried out in 2-week sprinters. Errors that occur are continually corrected as well as ongoing work in the other processes. The tenderer is expected to have competence in the following main areas. The list is not exhaustive: ·         ServiceNow platform ·         Licenses ·         Administration ·         Development ·         Integrations and integration security ·         Active and proactive consulting (ServiceNow and technology/architecture) ·         Coordination and planning ·         Work in multi-disciplinary teams ·         SLA and support Norsk Tipping currently has an agreement with DXC for ServiceNow. The agreement includes both consultancy services for the operation, management and further development of ServiceNow, as well as ServiceNow licences. The two parts of the existing agreement have different lengths. The agreement on consultancy services expires 27 February 2027, while the existing agreement on ServiceNow licences runs until February 2029. A new contract that will be signed as a result of this competition shall include both consultancy services and ServiceNow licences.

  Frist: 19.11.2026, 01:00 (Europe/Berlin)

Anforderungen an deinen Betrieb

Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, by enforceable judgement been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, involving European Communities or European Union member states (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier. Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42). Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition? Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15). Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48). Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1). Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. Has the tenderer: a) given grossly incorrect information with the notification of the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being fulfilled, b) failed to provide such information, c) made reservations immediately to present the supporting documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) improperly affected the contracting authority ́s decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award? Is the tenderer aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents? Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition? Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents. Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions? Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? Has the tenderer not fulfilled all of his tax and duty obligations in both the country where he is established and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision. Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, have been legally convicted of offences regarding professional behaviour in defence procurements? Is the tenderer assessed to lack the reliability necessary to exclude the risk of national security? The contracting authority shall state that in Norway there are national rejection reasons. These shall be described in the procurement documents. Tenderers must respond to whether they are in one or more of the situations described in the national rejection reasons.

Wie wird das Angebot bewertet?