Lieferung von Fleisch und Fleischwaren für institutionelle Küchen

LOT-0000 · Procurement - Meat and meat products, 2026

Weighting: The award criteria is weighted 40%.  Orientation: Tenderers shall fill in the attached price form in their cost calculations and submit it as an annex to the tender in Excel format. All fields in the attached price form marked with yellow shall be completed. Missing the price fields can cause difficulties in assessing the tender and the tender can then be rejected. All prices are in NOK, excluding VAT, including all direct or indirect expenses and duties that could be incurred in connection with the delivery. Order fees and invoice fees are to be seen as expenses. The prices shall include all costs for the customer who is included in this competition, including the procurement commission. Costs that the tenderer knows will be incurred, but that are not specifically stated in the tender, will be seen as included in the stated costs. All fields in the attached price form marked with yellow ought to be completed. Missing completion of the price fields can cause difficulties in assessing the tender and the tender offer may be rejected.  If a tenderer cannot offer one or more of the product lines in the price form and does not complete some product lines (or fill in the wrong product), the highest price offered for the relevant product line in the other tender will form the basis of the item line. Tenderers must, however, submit a tender for a minimum of approx. 95% of the product lines in the price form. Any deviations beyond this must be clarified in the "questions and answers" function in the competition tool TendSign. Tenderers must offer the necessary quality, breadth and depth in the assortment in the price form and these shall be products that will, in all probability, be available for all, or large parts of the agreement period. The product text of the products in the price form is based on the current contract product, as we would like all tenderers to get the same information on which products are purchased in the current contract. Please note that in the price form we have based the product text on the current contract product, we would like the same or equivalent, or better quality like this. Quality is in this context defined as quality criteria that are relevant for the product type, for example: portion of meat, flavour, consistency, raw material, nutritional content. Most of the items in the price form contain additional descriptions that provide a few more detailed descriptions of the product than the product name gives. The size references in the product text in the price form show approx. the size that shall be offered. If a tenderer does not have/can take in the stated size (unit packaging size and/or sales packaging size) in their assortment, the size that exists/can be taken into their assortment that is closest to the stated size shall be offered. The sale packaging size for the offered product shall be filled in the actual column in the price form, regardless of whether the size is equal to the size stated in the product line or not - this is i.a. so that the contracting authority can check sizes and to enable easier follow-up of this in the contract period. Product specifications:  All offered products shall fulfil the requirement specifications and be in accordance with the described product specifications in the price form. If a tenderer does not have the same product as described in the price form, a replacement product with identical qualities shall be inserted. The contracting authority will check the offered products in the price form, either in it's entirety or through sample samples. Deviations/missing answers can lead to the tender being rejected. If the tender includes deviations that the contracting authority considers small enough not to lead to rejection, the deviations shall as a main rule be corrected as soon as possible in the contract period. For example, if an item line is not in accordance with the product specifications, the tenderer shall replace the offered product with an item that fulfils the specifications - at the same or lower price. The same applies if an offered product over time and based on feedback from several different customers, is found not to be suitable for use in accordance with the customer ́s needs and requirements as described in the tender documentation. If tenders have not been submitted for a product line, tenderers must as soon as possible after the contract is signed, try to get the products that were not offered in their assortment during the first year of the contract period. Evaluation: When assessing the price, a hybrid model with break point 1 will be used. The attached template for the evaluation model is attached. The tenderer ́s total points for this award criteria is weighted with the award criteria ́s weighting percentage.

40 %

Weighting:  The award criteria is weighted 15%. Orientation: Tenderers are requested to enclose a description of the routines that will apply in this assignment. The contracting authority will emphasise, among other things:  Routines and deadlines regarding ordering and any changes to the order. routines/rules for defects/deviations and a replacement product, and procedures/systems for following up this. routines/handling regarding deviations and claims. routines for following-up the customers/contract and service offered to the customers, which is better than or beyond the minimum requirements in the requirement specifications. other relevant routines/procedures that will apply in the contract. The response shall be maximum 3 A4 pages. The response shall not include a cover page or table of contents. Any pages after page 3 will not be evaluated. Any links etc. in the reply will not be evaluated. Evaluation: This award criteria will be assessed based on the tenderer ́s description of the award criteria. A total procurement assessment of the described system will be carried out during the evaluation. Best solution will be awarded the highest score (10). Other solutions will be awarded a point score relative to the best solution.  The tenderer ́s total points for this award criteria is weighted with the award criteria ́s weighting percentage.

15 %

Weighting:  The award criteria is weighted 15%. Orientation: The Contracting Authority focuses on healthy diets in this procurement, but also safeguards nutritional considerations for different user groups. We would therefore like the product range to reflect this. Product specific nutrition criteria are listed for selected products in the price form that are requested to be fulfilled. There is particular focus on low salinity and high content of meat when requested. For some products, we would like the product to fulfil the entire keyhole regulations ́ terms. We emphasise that the products must not be the Keyhole Label in order to obtain credits, but fulfil the stated quality criteria. Products that fulfil the terms of the Keyhole Regulations without being labelled, are to be juxtaposed with branded products. The keyhole regulations terms for relevant products are attached in a help table. Tenderers in yellow cells in the relevant column (E) in the price form shall answer either "Yes" or "No" as to whether the product line meets the product specific nutrition criteria. Tenderers shall only answer "Yes" if the product line fulfils the criteria completely. Evaluation: This award criteria will be assessed based on the tenderer ́s response in yellow cells in the actual column in the price form. One point will be given per item line that fulfils the criteria. Ten points will be given for product lines that do not meet the criteria. Points will not be awarded for partial fulfilment of criteria - i.e. either the product lines fulfil the criteria fully and will be awarded 1 point, otherwise 0 is given 0 points. Any blank cells/cells that are not filled in with "Yes" or "No" will be considered "No"/not fulfilled. For each item line that meets the criteria, the point is multiplied by the estimated volume of the item line. All product lines that fulfil the criteria will then be summed together into a total sum. Best solution (highest total sum) will be awarded the highest score (10). Other solutions will be awarded a point score relative to the best solution.

15 %

Weighting:  The award criteria is weighted 30%. Orientation: Tenderers shall enclose a description of their environmental work that is relevant for this contract. The contracting authority will emphasise the evaluation, and what this response ought to include information on is the following: Minimise packaging without deteriorating the product/resulting in increased waste More environmentally smart packages  Reduction of food waste More climate-friendly distribution (e.g. transport and vehicles) Tenderers shall only describe work/measures that are actually ongoing, or that are actually planned to be initiated during the agreement period. The response shall have a maximum of 3 A4 pages. The response shall not include a cover page or table of contents. Any pages after page 3 will not be evaluated. Any links in the reply will not be evaluated. Evaluation: This award criteria will be assessed based on the tenderer ́s description of the award criteria. A total procurement assessment of the described system will be carried out during the evaluation. Best solution will be awarded the highest score (10). Other solutions will be awarded a point score relative to the best solution. The tenderer ́s total points for this award criteria is weighted with the award criteria ́s weighting percentage.

30 %