Landesweite digitale Schrägluftbilder mit 10-Zentimeter-Bodenauflösung
- Status
- Offen
- Angebotsfrist
- 04.12.2026, 13:00 (Europe/Berlin)
- Geschätzter Wert
- 40.000.000 DKK
- Lose
- 5
- Auftraggeber
- Klimadatastyrelsen
- Erfüllungsregion
- Dänemark
- Verfahren
- Offenes Verfahren
- Auftragsart
- Dienstleistung · Rahmenvereinbarung
- Veröffentlicht
- 02.11.2026
- CPV-Codes
AnzeigenAusblenden
- Dienstleistungen von Architektur-, Konstruktions- und Ingenieurbüros und Prüfstellen (71000000)
- Kartierung städtischer Gebiete (71222100)
- Kartierung ländlicher Gebiete (71222200)
- Dienstleistungen von Architektur- und Ingenieurbüros sowie planungsbezogene Leistungen (71240000)
- Digitalisierte Kartenerstellung (71354100)
- Luftbildvermessung (71354200)
- Photogrammetrische Dienstleistungen (71355100)
- Luftaufnahmen (79961200)
- Bekanntmachung
- comdia.com
- Bekanntmachungsnummer
- 757322-2026
- Verfahrensnummer
- 30f29e88-bf61-47a3-a90e-15db321f8028
Fragenkatalog
Deine Fragen an die Ausschreibung, beantwortet aus Bekanntmachung und Unterlagen.
Kurzbeschreibung
Die Klimadatastyrelsen, die dänische Behörde für Klimadaten im Geschäftsbereich des Ministeriums für Klima, Energie und Versorgung, beschafft hochwertige digitale Schrägluftbilder für die öffentliche Geodatenverwaltung in Dänemark. Die Leistung ist in fünf Gebietslose unterteilt, die jeweils etwa ein Fünftel des Landes abdecken; der geschätzte Gesamtwert beträgt 40 Millionen Dänische Kronen. Die Aufnahmen sollen im Zeitraum vom 21. März bis 21. September 2027 entstehen; eine weitere landesweite Erfassung 2029 ist vorbehaltlich verfügbarer Haushaltsmittel vorgesehen.
KI-Zusammenfassung · Maßgeblich ist die Originalbekanntmachung.
Auf einen Blick
KI-Auswertung der Bekanntmachung
So schnell verstehst du mit VergabeHero jede Ausschreibung.
Leistungsbeschreibung
The Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities. Agency for Climate Data (KDS), intend to establish a common oblique image dataset as a public geographical administrative basis for digital management (e-governance) in Denmark. The data set was first established in 2017 and updated in 2019, 2021, 2023 and 2025 using the same specification with amendments. This tender is more or less the same service, but with updated specification using the experiences from the previous five acquisitions. The purpose of the tender is to create the necessary high-quality oblique image’s in digital form, without blurring effects (clouds, smog etc.) and with a contrast and brightness sufficient to distinguish details and objects corresponding to actual ground sample distance (GSD) of 10 cm in centre pixel of the images. The oblique photography’s must be acquired during a timeframe during March 21st to September 21st and the tender is divided into five Lots/sub-agreements, where a Supplier can win maximum 2 Lots/sub-agreements. The framework in 2027 is covering one acquisition period, with the possibility of a second country wide acquisi-tion if the resources are granted under the government budget for 2029. To assist with the tendering the image quality from 2017, 2019, 2021, 2023 and 2025 can be observed here: https://skraafoto.dataforsyningen.dk/
Ganze Leistungsbeschreibung anzeigenWeniger anzeigen
Leistungen nach Losen (5)
LOT-0001 · Lot 18.000.000 DKK
Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8966km2
Frist: 04.12.2026, 01:00 (Europe/Berlin)
LOT-0002 · Lot 2
Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8744km2
Frist: 04.12.2026, 01:00 (Europe/Berlin)
LOT-0003 · Lot 3
Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8711 km2
Frist: 04.12.2026, 01:00 (Europe/Berlin)
LOT-0004 · Lot 4
Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8526km2
Frist: 04.12.2026, 01:00 (Europe/Berlin)
LOT-0005 · Lot 5
Lot1 covers approximate 1/5 of the country 8117m2
Frist: 04.12.2026, 01:00 (Europe/Berlin)
Anforderungen an deinen Betrieb
A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure if the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has failed to fulfil applicable environmental, social or labour law obligations under Union law, national law, collective agreements or environmental, social or labour law obligations derived from the conventions listed in Annex X to Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (Official Journal 2014, No L 94, page 65) or are the subject of acts adopted by the European Commission pursuant to Article 57(4) of the Directive in accordance with Article 88. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the tendering procedure if the candidate or tenderer has been declared bankrupt or is undergoing insolvency or winding-up proceedings, if its assets are managed by a liquidator or by the court if the latter is in composition, if his business activities have been suspended or if he is in a similar situation under a similar procedure; provided for in national law where the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has been guilty of grave professional misconduct casting doubt on the integrity of the candidate or tenderer. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure if the contracting entity has sufficient plausible indications to conclude that the candidate or tenderer has concluded an agreement with other economic operators with a view to distorting competition. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. A contracting entity must exclude a candidate or a tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure when the contracting entity can demonstrate that a conflict of interest, cf. section 24(18) of the Danish Public Procurement Act, cannot be effectively remedied by less restrictive measures in relation to the procurement procedure in question. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. A contracting entity must exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the contracting entity can demonstrate that a distortion of competition within the meaning of Section 39 of the Public Procurement Act resulting from the prior involvement of economic operators in the preparation of the procurement procedure in relation to the procurement procedure in question cannot be remedied by less restrictive measures. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure if the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has materially breached a previous public contract, contract with a utility or concession contract and the breach has resulted in the termination of that contract or a similar sanction. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has supplied grossly incorrect information, has withheld information or is unable to submit additional documents concerning the grounds for exclusion referred to in Section 135(1) or (3) of the Public Procurement Act and, where applicable, In section 137(1), no. 2 or 6 of the Public Procurement Act, the minimum requirements for suitability laid down in sections 140-144 of the Public Procurement Act or the selection in section 145. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. Section 134a of the Danish Public Procurement Act applies, which is why a contracting entity must exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure if the candidate or tenderer is established in a country that is included on the EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions and has not acceded to the WTO's Government Procurement Agreement or other trade agreements obliging Denmark to open the market for public contracts to tenderers established in that country. Section 134a (2) of the Public Procurement Act: Section 135(6) applies mutatis mutandis to situations covered by subsection (1). Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted a fine by final judgment for terrorist offences or offences related to terrorist activities as defined respectively in Articles 1, 3 and 4 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (Official Journal 2002, No L 164, page 3) as amended by Council Framework Decision 2008/919/JHA of 28 November 2008 amending Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism (Official Journal 2008, No L 330, page 21). Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act The contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer who has unpaid overdue debts of DKK 100,000 or more to public authorities relating to taxes, duties or social security contributions under Danish law or the law of the country in which the applicant or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted a fine by final judgment for acts committed within the framework of a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 (Official Journal 2008, No L 300, page 42). Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or fined by final judgment for money laundering or terrorist financing as defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (Official Journal 2005, No L 309, page 15). Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted a fine for fraud within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests by final judgment. Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure if the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted a fine by final judgment for an infringement of Section 262a of the Criminal Code or, in the case of a conviction from another country concerning child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings as defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting victims thereof, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (Official Journal 2011, No L 101, page 1). Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted a fine for corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union and Article 2(1) of the European Union Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the fight against corruption in the private sector (Official Journal 2003, No L 192, page 54) and corruption as defined by the national law of the Member State or home Member State of the candidate or tenderer or of the country in which the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
Wie wird das Angebot bewertet?
LOT-0001 · Lot 1
- When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a) a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample. It will not be required that the two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained below: Product Sample (Mandatory requirement) The product-sample dataset must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product. If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality. Siemens Star Sample (Mandatory requirement) For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems, such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832 - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N. Evaluation of the sample data The SDS is evaluated on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score. If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account. In case the supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory) the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed accordingly.
- 30 %
- Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss, secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score, as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score. All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues. Data acquisitions must be specified by: 1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately. Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in front of camera system. 2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution: The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment. The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage. 3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier will get 9 points, if not 1 point. 4. Past Projects: Three references must be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five (5) years.
- 30 %
- Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during post processing. All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will achieve a higher score. 1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization, single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field data etc. 2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and application. 3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore, it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
- 10 %
- The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2 (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots: • A price per km2 of basic areas. The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make sure the offered price will work for all lots. The supplier should be aware that his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight, image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination, aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer. All prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the winners of the ten-der.
- 30 %
LOT-0002 · Lot 2
- When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a) a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample. It will not be required that the two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained below: Product Sample (Mandatory requirement) The product-sample dataset must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product. If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality. Siemens Star Sample (Mandatory requirement) For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems, such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832 - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N. Evaluation of the sample data The SDS is evaluated on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score. If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account. In case the supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory) the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed accordingly.
- 30 %
- Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss, secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score, as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score. All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues. Data acquisitions must be specified by: 1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately. Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in front of camera system. 2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution: The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment. The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage. 3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier will get 9 points, if not 1 point. 4. Past Projects: Three references must be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five (5) years.
- 30 %
- Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during post processing. All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will achieve a higher score. 1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization, single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field data etc. 2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and application. 3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore, it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
- 10 %
- The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2 (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots: • A price per km2 of basic areas. The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make sure the offered price will work for all lots. The supplier should be aware that his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight, image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination, aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer. All prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the winners of the ten-der.
- 30 %
LOT-0003 · Lot 3
- When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a) a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample. It will not be required that the two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained below: Product Sample (Mandatory requirement) The product-sample dataset must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product. If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality. Siemens Star Sample (Mandatory requirement) For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems, such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832 - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N. Evaluation of the sample data The SDS is evaluated on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score. If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account. In case the supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory) the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed accordingly.
- 30 %
- Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss, secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score, as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score. All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues. Data acquisitions must be specified by: 1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately. Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in front of camera system. 2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution: The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment. The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage. 3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier will get 9 points, if not 1 point. 4. Past Projects: Three references must be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five (5) years.
- 30 %
- Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during post processing. All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will achieve a higher score. 1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization, single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field data etc. 2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and application. 3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore, it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
- 10 %
- The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2 (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots: • A price per km2 of basic areas. The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make sure the offered price will work for all lots. The supplier should be aware that his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight, image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination, aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer. All prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the winners of the ten-der.
- 30 %
LOT-0004 · Lot 4
- When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a) a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample. It will not be required that the two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained below: Product Sample (Mandatory requirement) The product-sample dataset must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product. If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality. Siemens Star Sample (Mandatory requirement) For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems, such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832 - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N. Evaluation of the sample data The SDS is evaluated on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score. If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account. In case the supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory) the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed accordingly.
- 30 %
- Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss, secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score, as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score. All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues. Data acquisitions must be specified by: 1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately. Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in front of camera system. 2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution: The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment. The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage. 3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier will get 9 points, if not 1 point. 4. Past Projects: Three references must be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five (5) years.
- 30 %
- Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during post processing. All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will achieve a higher score. 1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization, single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field data etc. 2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and application. 3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore, it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
- 10 %
- The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2 (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots: • A price per km2 of basic areas. The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make sure the offered price will work for all lots. The supplier should be aware that his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight, image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination, aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer. All prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the winners of the ten-der.
- 30 %
LOT-0005 · Lot 5
- When bidding a sample data set (SDS) must be provided. Sample data must include a) a Product Sample and b) a Siemens Star Sample. It will not be required that the two types of sample datasets are contained in the same data set, but may also come from different flights, areas, dates etc. The two sample data types are explained below: Product Sample (Mandatory requirement) The product-sample dataset must include one image from every camera-cone depicting the same urban or built-up area. The SDS must demonstrate the product offered or as close to the offered product. If the sample data differs from the offered product, both for better or worse, the differences and must be explained in a likeness documenta-tion. In the likeness document the supplier has the opportunity to explain either how the production deliveries will be better than the provided samples and, in this way, get a better score. Or explain how the delivered sample is better than what is to be expected, hereby ensuring that production deliveries are not rejected due to not match-ing the promised sample quality. Siemens Star Sample (Mandatory requirement) For the Siemens Star data any Siemens Star may be used. GSD/GRD is not required to match that of the general tender, but must be of a resolution relevant for the size of the specific Siemens Star, e.g. 10cm GSD for a 6m Sie-mens Star, 5cm GSD for a 3m Siemens Star etc. For multi-cone systems, such as oblique camera systems, the Sie-mens Star must be captured at least once in each cone and preferably in the center of each image. KDS has a Sie-mens Star in on top of a roof in HCA Airport which fits with 10cm GSD. E583933 m, N6148170 m, EPSG:25832 - ETRS89, UTM zone 32N. Evaluation of the sample data The SDS is evaluated on two parameters; a) a blind-test quality assessment of the SDS in respect to the offered product, and b) how well the SDS matches to the offered product. The more the SDS differs from the offered prod-uct, both better or worse, the lower the score. If a likeness document is provided this will be taken into account. In case the supplier does not have the offered system yet ( e.g. ordered from camera manufactory) the supplier must provide alternative sample data. The sample data will be accessed accordingly.
- 30 %
- Received offers with oblique aerial acquisition solutions which may lead to a better registration of data (safety in execution, minimization of data errors/data loss, secure data deliveries etc.) will achieve an increased weighting. Furthermore solutions that can lead to higher weighting are, but not limited to, intelligent solutions during data acquisition beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s. Equipment or solutions that can offer extra value e.g. LiDAR at the same time as oblique acquisition may lead to a higher score, as well as more AUs to one Lot will score higher. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible ten-der will achieve a higher score. All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues. Data acquisitions must be specified by: 1. Acquisition Equipment: Equipment suitable for mapping purposes will receive higher scores. Nadir and oblique cameras will be evaluated separately. Parameters that will be looked at is e.g. internal- and external stability. External factors that may lower the score is e.g. bad handling of exhaust or glass plate in front of camera system. 2. Stationing, Mission, Planning and Execution: The Supplier must describe how they are securing sufficient aircraft/camera capacity at location and data capacity on the aircraft, as well where the AU is based during the acquisition period will be evaluated. Furthermore the description must al-so contain information about backup systems in case of breakdown on important acquisition equipment. The Supplier must also describe oblique aerial data acquisition including methods of assessing suitable exposure weather, planning of no-fly zones, planning of overlap to ensure all demands are met with regards to overlap, sidelap and building coverage. 3. LiDAR acquisition: If the supplier offer simultaneously acquisition of LiDAR data and delivers unclassified LiDAR point cloud and trajectories, but without cross strips and strip adjustments, as part of the offer. If this is offered the supplier will get 9 points, if not 1 point. 4. Past Projects: Three references must be delivered where data acquisition of digital aerial oblique data acquisition is a major part – it will lower the score if full AT is not part of reference. Refer-ences that will score higher if they are similar to the current job. The references will be measured on: size, GSD, geographical placement, equipment (is it same/similar as being offered) and a full AT of all images is part of the task. All references must be in English, and must have a clear con-tact person. The Customer reserves the right to contact the references for verification. If the Supplier cannot get three relevant references, they must write why e.g. new company and argue why they would be able to perform the task. The tasks solved in the references must not be older than five (5) years.
- 30 %
- Offers that justify the data deliveries will be delivered timely with superior quality and good description about how handle bottle necks and the data conveyance from plane to the delivery is at the Tenderer. Furthermore, solutions that can lead to higher weighting are, intelligent solutions during post processing beyond what is asked for in the tender material to ensure better quality of GNSS/INS, imagery or AT’s during post processing. All descriptions must contain QA procedures for the specific task. Increased weight will be given to descriptions, which is specific to this assignment or local Danish issues. Furthermore, a well-structured and accessible tender will achieve a higher score. 1. Post Processing Imagery: Image processing includes as minimum description on how the Suppli-er can make post processed raw images in a way that they fit the final product in the best possible way, i.e. block harmonization, single image improvement, how the harmonization between the four oblique images in one exposure, productions methods that limits bottlenecks, use of calibra-tion field data etc. 2. Computation of Aerotriangulation: Measures and routines that ensures timely and correct calcu-lated aerotriangulation. This include a complete description of workflow from the data leaves the plane until the final calculation is finished, including steps and quality control measures. One step could be assessment of the result of GNNS/INS calculation, before moving into block adjust-ment of all images, another could be description of boresight and lever arm determination and application. 3. Deliveries: Describe in a simple matter a time schedule and how productions steps and delivery times are affected e.g. GANTT diagram. Furthermore, it must be described which bottlenecks, is-sues etc. that can occur during the full production and how to mitigate these, this could be done via a risc. Log or similar.
- 10 %
- The pricing of the tendered work must be presented per AU as a unified price per km2 (Annex Q.2) including all possible expenses e.g. all services demanded as described in Annex A.1. The price must be given per AU and for all five lots: • A price per km2 of basic areas. The same for all lots, so the Supplier must make sure the offered price will work for all lots. The supplier should be aware that his offered price for a km2 must contain all expenses (planning, standby, flight, image exposure, GPS/INS-registration, data logistics/storing, GPS/INS-determination, aerotriangulation, pro-cessing, deliveries etc.). All expenses – also expenses in connection with conveyance of data, insurance etc. must be included in the given offer. All prices will be made public in connection with the announcement of the result of the winners of the ten-der.
- 30 %
Vergabeunterlagen
Keine abgerufenen Dateien hinterlegt. Ein abgeschlossener Abruf ist nicht dokumentiert.
Zum UrsprungsportalAnforderungen
A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure if the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has failed to fulfil applicable environmental, social or labour law obligations under Union law, national law, collective agreements or environmental, social or labour law obligations derived from the conventions listed in Annex X to Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (Official Journal 2014, No L 94, page 65) or are the subject of acts adopted by the European Commission pursuant to Article 57(4) of the Directive in accordance with Article 88. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the tendering procedure if the candidate or tenderer has been declared bankrupt or is undergoing insolvency or winding-up proceedings, if its assets are managed by a liquidator or by the court if the latter is in composition, if his business activities have been suspended or if he is in a similar situation under a similar procedure; provided for in national law where the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has been guilty of grave professional misconduct casting doubt on the integrity of the candidate or tenderer. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure if the contracting entity has sufficient plausible indications to conclude that the candidate or tenderer has concluded an agreement with other economic operators with a view to distorting competition. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. A contracting entity must exclude a candidate or a tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure when the contracting entity can demonstrate that a conflict of interest, cf. section 24(18) of the Danish Public Procurement Act, cannot be effectively remedied by less restrictive measures in relation to the procurement procedure in question. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. A contracting entity must exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the contracting entity can demonstrate that a distortion of competition within the meaning of Section 39 of the Public Procurement Act resulting from the prior involvement of economic operators in the preparation of the procurement procedure in relation to the procurement procedure in question cannot be remedied by less restrictive measures. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. A candidate or tenderer will be excluded from participation in the procurement procedure if the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has materially breached a previous public contract, contract with a utility or concession contract and the breach has resulted in the termination of that contract or a similar sanction. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the contracting entity can demonstrate that the candidate or tenderer has supplied grossly incorrect information, has withheld information or is unable to submit additional documents concerning the grounds for exclusion referred to in Section 135(1) or (3) of the Public Procurement Act and, where applicable, In section 137(1), no. 2 or 6 of the Public Procurement Act, the minimum requirements for suitability laid down in sections 140-144 of the Public Procurement Act or the selection in section 145. Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. Section 134a of the Danish Public Procurement Act applies, which is why a contracting entity must exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure if the candidate or tenderer is established in a country that is included on the EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions and has not acceded to the WTO's Government Procurement Agreement or other trade agreements obliging Denmark to open the market for public contracts to tenderers established in that country. Section 134a (2) of the Public Procurement Act: Section 135(6) applies mutatis mutandis to situations covered by subsection (1). Documentation: The contracting entity shall be entitled to obtain appropriate evidence as to whether the candidate or tenderer is in a situation which may give rise to exclusion pursuant to this ground for exclusion. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted a fine by final judgment for terrorist offences or offences related to terrorist activities as defined respectively in Articles 1, 3 and 4 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (Official Journal 2002, No L 164, page 3) as amended by Council Framework Decision 2008/919/JHA of 28 November 2008 amending Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism (Official Journal 2008, No L 330, page 21). Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act The contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer who has unpaid overdue debts of DKK 100,000 or more to public authorities relating to taxes, duties or social security contributions under Danish law or the law of the country in which the applicant or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted a fine by final judgment for acts committed within the framework of a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 (Official Journal 2008, No L 300, page 42). Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or fined by final judgment for money laundering or terrorist financing as defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (Official Journal 2005, No L 309, page 15). Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted a fine for fraud within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests by final judgment. Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure if the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted a fine by final judgment for an infringement of Section 262a of the Criminal Code or, in the case of a conviction from another country concerning child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings as defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting victims thereof, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (Official Journal 2011, No L 101, page 1). Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act. A contracting entity shall exclude a candidate or tenderer from participation in a procurement procedure where the candidate or tenderer has been convicted or has adopted a fine for corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union and Article 2(1) of the European Union Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the fight against corruption in the private sector (Official Journal 2003, No L 192, page 54) and corruption as defined by the national law of the Member State or home Member State of the candidate or tenderer or of the country in which the candidate or tenderer is established. Documentation: in accordance with sections 152-153 of the Danish Public Procurement Act.
Änderungen und Bieterfragen
0 EinträgeKeine Änderungen zur Bekanntmachung bekannt.
Welche ähnlichen Ausschreibungen sind offen?
Alle ähnlichen Ausschreibungen anzeigenAlle Angaben ohne Gewähr. Ausschreibungen können sich jederzeit ändern – wir übernehmen keine Gewähr für Aktualität, Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit der hier dargestellten Daten. Maßgeblich ist stets die Originalbekanntmachung des Auftraggebers.